Vivo X80 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S22+: How the two flagship smartphones compare – Times of India

Vivo X80 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S22+: How the two flagship smartphones compare – Times of India

NEW DELHI: Vivo launched its most expensive smartphone — Vivo X80 Pro in India. The smartphone sports a quad-rear camera setup developed by Zeiss Optics. The smartphone promises to offer a redefined camera experience and is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset.
Vivo X80 Pro runs Android 12 operating system and it sports a water-resistant design. The smartphone features a Quad HD+ display with variable refresh rate. The smartphone is backed by a 4700mAh battery and it comes with a vapor chamber cooling.
The smartphone comes with a price tag of Rs 79,999 and it will compete against the Samsung Galaxy S22+ which was launched earlier this year. Priced at Rs 84,999, the smartphone is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset and runs Android 12 operating system.
Wondering how the two flagship smartphones compare? We bring you a complete spec-by-spec comparison of the two smartphones.

SpecificationsVivo X80 ProSamsung Galaxy S22+
Display6.78-inch (3200×1440 pixels) Quad HD+6.6-inch FHD+ Infinity-O Dynamic AMOLED Display
ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Operating systemAndroid 12Android 12
RAM12GB8GB
Storage256GB128GB/256GB
Camera50MP+48MP+12MP+8MP, 32MP (Front)50MP+12MP+10MP, 10MP (Front)
Battery4700mAh battery with 80W fast charging, 50W wireless fast charging, 10W wireless reverse charging4500mAh battery with 45W fast charging, 15W wireless fast charging
PriceRs 79,990Rs 84,999

!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s) {if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)}; if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′; n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,’script’, ‘https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js’); fbq(‘init’, ‘593671331875494’); fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);

Source link